Neither Belindia nor Banglalbania,
Brazil after the Real is closer to Enghana
After the 1988 Constitution and the Real Plan in 1994, Brazil no longer resembles a mix of Belgium and India; it is much closer to a mixture of England and Ghana

In 1974, the economist Edmar Bacha wrote a fable that popularized the term “Belindia� to define the distribution of wealth in Brazil at the time: part Belgium (small and rich) and part India (large and poor). At the pyramid’s top, a small part of the population (classes A and B) and at the base, the vast majority, poor and devoid of resources.
“At the time, such a narrative was used to criticize the military regime’s economic policy of wealth concentration.”
Época Negócios, 06.05.09
25 years later, in an interview in Folha de S. Paulo about the 15th anniversary of the Real plan, Edmar Bacha, considered one of its “fathers�, corrects his former definition of the country, taking into consideration the plan’s success and the changes Brazil has gone through over the last few years.
“Inequality is still a strong trait, but the combination of stable growth and social policies has improved the “Indiaâ€? part of Brazil. Under such circumstances it is no longer correct to talk of Belindia anymore. Maybe the compound name proposed by Delfim Netto is more appropriate nowadays: Enghana – England’s taxes and Ghana’s public services. Anyway, at least we were able to avoid Banglalbania – Bangladesh and Albania –, so feared by Mario Henrique Simonsen.”
Edmar Bacha, Folha de S. Paulo, 01.07.09
The expression “Enghana� was coined by the economist and former minister of the Treasury, Agriculture and Planning, Antonio Delfim Netto, especially to characterize the new Brazilian post-stability, with a developed country’s tax burden and underdeveloped country’s public services, which is the case in Ghana. In relation to the tax burden, last week a new record (36% of the GDP) for 2008 was officially published.
“The tax burden, which for 30 years had varied around 25% of the national income, has skyrocketed to levels that exist only in communist or social-democratic countries.”
Gustavo Patu, Folha de S. Paulo, 08.07.09
Two factors have contributed to the increase of about 10 percent over the past years: one, the obligations generated by the 1988 constitution that drafted a distributive State and, second, the macroeconomic stability that has transformed chronic inflation into debt, which requires a large number of resources to continue financing it; and what’s worse, the revenues come mostly from indirect taxes, which penalizes, very much so, the poor.
“Instead of prioritizing direct and income-based taxing, following the example of social-democratic countries, Brazil has opted for concentrating revenues through indirect taxes, which weighs more heavily on the shoulders of the poorer population.”
Gustavo Patu, Folha de S. Paulo, 08.07.09
This is a new characteristic of the country Edmar Bacha says is no longer Belindia and Delfim Netto calls Enghana: it has made great social improvements but has also increased the tax burden, especially on the poor, besides maintaining the quality of its public services at very precarious levels. But, this is something to be discussed in another GH.






